国产91视频久久,亚洲综合色图在线观看,五月天操逼网,日韩色色AV,青青在线A片,亚洲最大色在线观看,欧美熟妇丝袜诱惑,青青操逼视频,日韩无码操出水

 
Post My RFQ |
Home > GuideTrends  > Basic Chemicals  > Sodium hydrosulfide

Sodium hydrosulfide

  • 1630CNY/TON Updated: 2026-05-30
  • Price change (DoD): 0
    Average price (3M):1611 CNY/TON
    Price Level(1Y):Low
    Follow Comparison
Products Suppliers Prices

Sodium hydrosulfide Prices Trends in China

Select Spec:

Sodium hydrosulfide Prices sources

Reg Spec 2026/05/28 2026/05/29 2026/05/30 ChangeUnit Comparison
East China
  • Binzhou, Shandong Sodium hydrosulfide, solid, 70% content - 4000 - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong 32% Sodium Hydrosulfide (Liquid) - 1150 - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong 70% Sodium hydrosulfide (solid) - 3400 - 0/0 CNY/TON

Sodium hydrosulfide Market Analysis

Sodium Hydrogen Sulfide (NaHS) Commodity Market Intelligence Analysis (May 27, 2026)

I. Market Price Dynamics (May 25–26, 2026)
| Specification | Region/Delivery Location | Price Range (CNY/ton) | Quoting Entity/Brand | Trend Analysis |
|--------------|---------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| 70% Solid | Shandong Province | 2,500–4,200 | Liaocheng Jinxinda / Shandong Yuxuan | Significant regional price spread; premium pricing evident for high-end products |
| 70% Solid | Henan Province | 4,000 | Jia’en Chemical | Cross-regional quotations remain at elevated levels |
| 32% Liquid | Shandong Province | 1,300–1,630 | Qingyuan Petrochemical / Shandong Huayou | Cost advantage prominent for petroleum-derived products |
| 32% Liquid | Hubei Province | 1,150 | Shandong Yuanshun | Enhanced liquidity in low-price regions |

Key Findings:
1. Price divergence among solid products is intensifying: Shandong Yuxuan’s quotation of CNY 4,200/ton is 68% higher than Liaocheng Jinxinda’s, reflecting growing demand for customized high-end products.
2. Liquid products demonstrate a clear cost advantage along the “petroleum by-product route”: Shandong Huayou’s price of CNY 1,630/ton is 15–20% lower than that of conventionally produced alternatives.
3. Persistent cross-regional price spreads exist—solid product prices in Henan Province are 60% higher than those in Shandong Province, indicating regional supply-demand imbalance.

II. Evolution of Supply-Demand Structure
Supply Side:
1. Capacity Structure Optimization: Industry capacity expanded from 485,000 tons in 2021 to 655,000 tons in 2026; however, actual output growth (CAGR: 7%) has outpaced capacity growth (CAGR: 4.2%), signaling accelerated phasing-out of outdated capacity.
2. Accelerated Process Innovation: Adoption rate of continuous microchannel reaction technology exceeds 60%, reducing environmental compliance costs by 35% compared with traditional batch reactor processes.
3. Rising Regional Concentration: Shandong Province accounts for 45% of national capacity, forming an industrial cluster centered on Binzhou and Zibo.

Demand Side:
1. Traditional Sectors as Stabilizers:
– Textile dyeing and leather processing maintain steady demand share at 28%; however, rising demand for premium fabrics has lifted the share of high-purity products to 40%.
– Copper ore flotation demand grows at an annual rate of 12%, making it the largest consumption segment.
2. Emerging Growth Drivers:
– Demand from new-energy battery recycling has surpassed 15% of total consumption, driving surging demand for ultra-low heavy-metal-content products.
– Wastewater treatment usage grows annually by 18%, significantly boosting demand for 32% liquid NaHS.

III. Price Driver Analysis
Cost Drivers:
1. Sulfur Price Correlation: Average sulfur market price in May reached CNY 1,850/ton, up 22% year-on-year, directly increasing production costs by ~CNY 300/ton.
2. Energy Cost Pressure: Coal Price Index rose 15% since the beginning of the year, increasing steam costs by 8%.
3. Environmental Compliance Costs: Leading enterprises incur average environmental expenditures of CNY 200/ton—40% higher than SMEs.

Policy Drivers:
1. Dual-Carbon Target Constraints: Implementation of mandatory energy consumption limits per unit of product is accelerating enterprise technological upgrades.
2. Strengthened Safety Regulation: A nationwide special rectification campaign targeting sodium hydrogen sulfide was launched in Q1 2026, resulting in the shutdown of 12,000 tons of non-compliant capacity.
3. Anticipated Standards Upgrade: The upcoming national standard GB/T 23937-202X will raise requirements for heavy metal content by 50%.

IV. Future Outlook (2026–2027)
Price Trends:
1. Short-Term Volatility: Amid persistently high sulfur prices, average solid product prices in June are projected to remain within CNY 3,800–4,000/ton.
2. Medium-Term Divergence:
– Premium customized products (e.g., electronic-grade) are expected to rise 8–10% annually.
– Commodity-grade products face downward pressure of 5–8% annually due to new capacity entries.
3. Long-Term Trend: As continuous-process technologies become mainstream, industry-wide average production costs are projected to decline by 15%, facilitating a return of average market prices to rational levels.

Supply-Demand Structure:
1. Capacity Release Pace: An additional 38,000 tons of capacity is expected to come online in Q3 2026, though effective incremental capacity will likely be capped at 25,000 tons.
2. Demand Structural Shift: Demand from new-energy sectors is projected to exceed 20% of total consumption, becoming the primary growth driver.
3. Import-Export Landscape: Export volume is forecast to grow 15% annually, primarily targeting Southeast Asian markets; import dependency will fall below 5%.

Industry Risk Factors:
1. Raw Material Supply Volatility: Sulfur import dependency exceeds 60%; geopolitical conflicts may trigger sharp price fluctuations.
2. Occupational Safety Incidents: Three H?S leakage incidents occurred in 2026, prompting stricter regulation and potential temporary shutdowns.
3. Substitution Threat: Penetration of novel desulfurization agents in wastewater treatment is increasing at 5% annually, posing substitution pressure on liquid NaHS products.

V. Strategic Recommendations
1. Production Side: Accelerate adoption of continuous-process technologies and develop integrated value chains for by-products such as sodium thiosulfate.
2. Trading Side: Implement a hybrid “futures + spot” pricing mechanism to hedge against sulfur price volatility.
3. Downstream Customer Engagement: Promote a “product + process optimization” service model to elevate high-value-added product share to over 50%.
4. Investment Side: Prioritize enterprises with integrated petroleum-by-product resource utilization capabilities and those expanding customized production capacity for new-energy applications.

About Sodium hydrosulfide



the copper ore beneficiation,the sulfurous acid dyeing of manmade fibre,the synthesis of organic intermediates,the preparation of auxiliary agent of sulfur dyes,and waste water treatment; raw material to produce ammonium sulphate and ethanethiol
white crystals or powder with a very unpleasant smell

This chemical is included in Basic Chemicals. See more about what is Sodium hydrosulfide and Sodium hydrosulfide SDS information.

Find Sodium hydrosulfide supply and Sodium hydrosulfide suppliers on Guidechem to meet your sourcing needs from 110 trusted and certifedsuppliers.

More Related Products Prices

N,N-Dimethylformamide Potassium hydroxide powdered activated carbon Formic acid Propylene glycol Xylene ethyl acetate Sodium carbonate diethylene glycol Phenol Dichloromethane Glycerol tert-Butyl methyl ether Ethylene glycol Acetic acid cylindrical activated carbon styrene Isopropyl alcohol Epichlorohydrin Benzene

Guidechem assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, fitness for purpose or timeliness.

 
 
My Follow
Comparison
No Selected:0 indicators Follow Clear
Tip: Curve comparison supports up to 10 indicators, and the display order of indicators can be adjusted by dragging them,View Comparison
海丰县| 建始县| 济宁市| 永平县| 临漳县| 玉树县| 江北区| 内黄县| 本溪市| 文山县| 来安县| 合阳县| 郎溪县| 苗栗市| 公安县| 都兰县| 合肥市| 赫章县| 襄汾县| 清新县| 开鲁县| 固始县| 康马县| 迁安市| 鹿邑县| 广南县| 沁源县| 莱阳市| 呈贡县| 手机| 高唐县| 和静县| 定安县| 元朗区| 通化市| 安陆市| 双流县| 大姚县| 托里县| 孟连| 广灵县|