国产91视频久久,亚洲综合色图在线观看,五月天操逼网,日韩色色AV,青青在线A片,亚洲最大色在线观看,欧美熟妇丝袜诱惑,青青操逼视频,日韩无码操出水

 
Post My RFQ |
Home > GuideTrends  > Fine Chemicals  > Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate

Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate

  • 1660CNY/TON Updated: 2026-05-29
  • Price change (DoD): 0
    Average price (3M):1667 CNY/TON
    Price Level(1Y):Mid
    Follow Comparison
Products Suppliers Prices

Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate Prices Trends in China

Select Spec:

Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate Prices sources

Reg Spec 2026/05/27 2026/05/28 2026/05/29 ChangeUnit Comparison
East China
  • Shandong 99% Industrial Grade 1600 1600 1600 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Dongyue 99Content Granules 1692 1730 1650 -80/-80 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Dongyue 99Content Powder 1750 1610 1625 15/15 CNY/TON
  • Shandong Province First-Class Content99% 1880 - - 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shanghai 99Content Granules 1880 1880 1880 0/0 CNY/TON
  • Shanghai 99Content Powder 1980 1980 1980 0/0 CNY/TON
Domestic
  • Domestic 99Content Granules 1660 1660 1660 0/0 CNY/TON

Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate Market Analysis

Dynamic Market Intelligence Report on Sodium Metasilicate Pentahydrate (Na?SiO?·5H?O)

I. Market Price Dynamics
- **Latest Quotation**: As of May 25, 2026, the Business Society’s benchmark price for sodium metasilicate pentahydrate stood at RMB 1,660.00 per ton, unchanged from the beginning of the month. The price is currently trading at its annual median level, with a yearly fluctuation range of RMB 1,568.00–1,750.00 per ton.
- **Regional Variation**: Hubei Qibajiu Chemical Co., Ltd. quoted RMB 1,500 per ton (ex-factory, delivery in Wuhan), reflecting regional pricing flexibility.
- **Historical Comparison**: The average ex-factory price in the East China region was RMB 1,850–2,050 per ton in 2025—approximately 18% lower than the peak level observed in 2021, indicating sustained long-term pricing pressure.

II. Supply-Demand Analysis
- **Supply Side**:
- **Overcapacity**: National effective production capacity reached 1.28 million tons in 2025, while apparent consumption volume amounted to only 973,000 tons—resulting in a long-term capacity utilization rate below 76%.
- **Structural Imbalance**: Overcapacity persists in low- and mid-end general-purpose products, whereas high-end variants (e.g., high-purity, fast-dissolving grades) remain undersupplied. In 2025, import volume totaled 12,700 tons, up 6.3% year-on-year.
- **Regional Concentration**: Shandong, Jiangsu, and Hebei provinces collectively account for 62.3% of national capacity; however, latent (unregistered or informal) capacity exists in certain local industrial parks, posing environmental and supply-chain risks.
- **Demand Side**:
- **Decline in Traditional Applications**: Demand from the detergent industry fell from 43.2% of total consumption in 2020 to 31.6% in 2025, significantly impacted by eco-friendly alternatives such as SKS-6 and polycarboxylates.
- **Growth in Emerging Applications**: Demand from water treatment and industrial cleaning rose to 28.4% of total consumption, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.8%; applications in lithium-ion battery separator coatings and photovoltaic glass clarifiers are expanding at over 15% CAGR annually.
- **Export Potential**: Rising demand for high-purity products in Southeast Asia, South Asia, and Africa is evident: products with 99.5% purity demonstrate a 23% faster dissolution rate and residue levels below 0.15%, supporting an expected export share increase from 14% in 2023 to 21% in 2025.

III. Cost and Profitability Analysis
- **Raw Material Volatility**: Price fluctuations in quartz sand and caustic soda exert elasticity coefficients of 0.18 and 0.31, respectively, on per-ton production cost—highlighting the need for close monitoring of upstream markets.
- **Process-Specific Costs**: Wet-process technology incurs ~12% lower unit production costs than dry-process methods, yet entails environmental compliance costs 1.8× higher. Conversely, the dry process achieves near-zero wastewater discharge and reduces carbon intensity to 0.68 tons CO? per ton of product—aligning with China’s “Dual Carbon” (carbon peak & carbon neutrality) goals.
- **Margin Compression**: Gross margins for SMEs have narrowed to 8–12%, with operational efficiency markedly lagging behind industry leaders. A one-grade downgrade in environmental credit rating leads, on average, to a 37% reduction in financial institution credit lines and a 1.8 percentage-point increase in financing costs.

IV. Policy and Environmental Impact
- **Tightening Environmental Oversight**: The Ministry of Ecology and Environment mandates that all operating enterprises obtain emission permits by end-2025; non-compliant facilities face suspension, rectification orders, or mandated capacity reductions.
- **Energy Efficiency Retrofit Pressure**: New projects must maintain comprehensive energy consumption at ≤0.85 tons of standard coal per ton of product; existing facilities must complete energy-efficiency retrofits by end-2025, though only 61.4% of current capacity meets this standard.
- **Regional Policy Divergence**: Certain industrial parks in North and East China have been designated as “Key Control Zones”, prohibiting new high-water-consumption or high-emission projects—accelerating corporate relocation toward compliant chemical industrial parks.

V. Analysis, Outlook & Forecast

A. Short-Term Price Trend
- **Price Stability**: Current market prices remain stable at mid-range levels, with no acute supply-demand imbalance emerging; short-term price volatility is expected to be limited.
- **Regional Divergence**: Minor price variations across regions may arise due to transportation costs and localized supply-demand conditions—but overall fluctuations will remain modest.

B. Medium- to Long-Term Trends
- **Demand Structure Upgrade**: Continued contraction in detergent-related demand will be offset by robust growth in water treatment, industrial cleaning, and emerging applications—driving stronger demand for premium-grade products.
- **Accelerated Capacity Consolidation**: Stricter environmental regulations and energy-efficiency standards will expedite the exit of outdated capacity, further increasing industry concentration. The CR10 (combined market share of top 10 firms) is projected to rise from 58.7% in 2025 to over 65% by 2030.
- **Green Process Transformation**: Dry-process technologies and low-energy-intensity innovations will become mainstream, enabling continuous reductions in per-unit energy consumption and carbon emissions—conferring competitive advantage upon enterprises aligned with “Dual Carbon” objectives.
- **Export Market Expansion**: Growing international demand for high-purity products creates opportunities for enhanced global market penetration; enterprises must strengthen overseas marketing, product competitiveness, and brand equity.

C. Risks and Opportunities
- **Risks**:
- Sharp raw material price swings may undermine cost stability.
- Further tightening of environmental regulations could escalate compliance expenditures.
- Accelerated technological substitution (e.g., SKS-6 replacing sodium metasilicate pentahydrate) may erode core market demand.
- **Opportunities**:
- Emerging application sectors—including lithium batteries and photovoltaics—offer substantial incremental growth potential.
- Green process transformation unlocks policy incentives and enhanced market recognition.
- Export expansion supports enterprises’ internationalization strategies.

About Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate




White solid SODIUM METASILICATE PENTAHYDRATE Preparation Products And Raw materials Raw materials

This chemical is included in Fine Chemicals. See more about what is Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate and Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate SDS information.

Find Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate supply and Sodium metasilicate pentahydrate suppliers on Guidechem to meet your sourcing needs from 164 trusted and certifedsuppliers.

More Related Products Prices

Aluminum chlorohydrate Polyacrylamide sodium acetate Citric acid powdered activated carbon Oxalic acid Sodium hypochlorite N,N-Dimethylacetamide sodium acetate trihydrate Triethylamine Iron sesquisulfate Diethanolamine Sulfamic acid Ethylene glycol diacetate Dimethylamine Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether Trichloroethylene N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone 2-[(Carboxymethyl)thio]benzoic acid Ferric chloride

Guidechem assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, fitness for purpose or timeliness.

 
 
My Follow
Comparison
No Selected:0 indicators Follow Clear
Tip: Curve comparison supports up to 10 indicators, and the display order of indicators can be adjusted by dragging them,View Comparison
自治县| 唐河县| 金乡县| 沈丘县| 凯里市| 泰和县| 河曲县| 北票市| 昭苏县| 灵宝市| 通州市| 博野县| 汕尾市| 浦东新区| 呼玛县| 吴堡县| 平邑县| 合水县| 固镇县| 福泉市| 万全县| 岳阳市| 峨眉山市| 济南市| 措勤县| 东辽县| 衡山县| 阆中市| 怀安县| 洮南市| 阜南县| 武宁县| 沅江市| 江北区| 宁强县| 曲松县| 清苑县| 东乌| 徐水县| 文水县| 德州市|